Marco Verdi is a seasoned IT strategist with over 15 years of experience in digital transformation and cybersecurity.
It has been described as a major frauds of its type in the United Kingdom.
A total of 14 defendants have been found guilty for their part in a £28m plot to cheat more than 3,500 timeshare investors.
The victims were eager to exit long-standing vacation property deals and went looking for assistance.
A large number were aged between 60 and 80. In excess of 500 of them lost over £10,000, and one individual handed over in excess of £80,000.
Those targeted were faced aggressive consultations continuing for six hours. They were left out of pocket, owning valueless fake "credits" and continued to be trapped in expensive vacation property deals they could no longer use.
The firm at the centre of the scam was the timeshare resale company. They collected people's money to support the owners' lavish way of life of prestigious schooling, millionaire mansions and personal aircraft.
The individual at the top of the firm, the main defendant, was handed a seven-and-half year prison term in January for deceptive scheme.
In the latest development, his wife Nicola was part of the concluding cases to hear their sentences.
She was handed a two-year long suspended jail sentence at the judicial venue after admitting money laundering.
It has been a lengthy process and represents a huge win for the people who spoke out, the authorities and legal representatives.
I first heard about the company came in the mid-2016. I was working in the investigations unit of a broadcasting service, making investigative shows.
A acquaintance noted that his mum had assumed the rights of a vacation unit in a European resort and, after years of holidays, had started seeking to terminate the deal.
It's worth mentioning how popular vacation properties had evolved with UK travelers in the last decades of the 20th century.
Timeshares allowed families to access the equivalent unit annually, or exchange their weeks with additional holders who had properties in different locations. About 600,000 vacation seekers accepted that opportunity.
The early surge was paired with a lot of reports about unscrupulous sellers fraudulently marketing units. They became a staple on investigative shows.
The standard vacation property deal tied investors in for decades.
By 2016, those owners who had experienced their assigned property in the resort for 20 or 30 years were ageing, and a significant number were looking to wave goodbye to their holiday properties.
A number had reduced ability to travel and found it difficult to access their apartments. A few just felt they'd got all they wanted from them. And some had deceased, in many cases bequeathing their loved ones to take over the agreements - along with their yearly fees and upkeep costs.
And that's where the relative had ended up. She looked online for answers and found the organization, a business whose online presence claimed to release her from her agreement.
However, having paid a fee and booked a meeting with them, her relatives had doubts.
Additional investigation revealed many victims claiming they had paid money and got nothing out of it. Actually, they had suffered financially. Substantial amounts.
The investigative unit commenced probing what was occurring. It was rapidly apparent that there were questionable operators active in the holiday ownership market.
One lawyer had many grievance cases preparing to take action against the organization.
The team interviewed clients who had engaged the company and they each reported similar experiences. They believed the firm would buy their property off them but when they went to a consultation (for which they made an advance payment) they were told there was no re-sale value.
Rather, they were persuaded - indeed compelled - to spend more money investing in "the company's points system", associated with the business's umbrella group, the parent organization.
What exactly these were was not exactly clear. They seemed similar to a kind of currency, offering reduced-price holidays and amenities and consumer discounts.
And they were reportedly "exchangeable with fellow investors, some time down the line.
Paying cash at the time would result in an future return that would cover the firm's costs and allow the investor in profit, released finally from their troublesome contract.
Too good to be true? Certainly, that proved correct.
If these accounts were true, this was a large-scale fraud.
The technique is termed a "misleading sales."
An operator - here the company - "baits" the customer by promoting a particular product but then to state it cannot be provided, steering the client to a different, lower-quality option.
That's illegal. Armed with all the testimony we had collected, we argued to discreetly video one of the firm's consultations.
This takes commitment, energy, and clear arguments for why this is the exclusive approach to obtain the information necessary to demonstrate illegal activity.
Armed with that permission, our limited crew set up a meeting with one of the firm's agents in the English town.
Acting as a potential client wanting to help his mother free from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement
Marco Verdi is a seasoned IT strategist with over 15 years of experience in digital transformation and cybersecurity.